Microsoft -v- USA is an important ongoing case, currently listed for hearing in 2015 before the US Federal Court of Appeal of the 2nd Circuit.
Digital Rights Ireland files Amicus Brief in Microsoft v USA with Liberty and ORG Read More »
When challenged on how it has the right to ask for people’s PPS numbers, Irish Water has said that it is a specified body under statute.
Irish Water, PPSNs and the missing Minister’s agreement Read More »
Today’s Irish Sun has, on its front page, a story suggesting that compensation will be given to women who were the victims of PIP Breast Implants injuries.
Reports of Compensation for PIP Breast Implant injuries Read More »
In case you missed it with all the World Cup and such, last night UK Labour backbencher Tom Watson put out an urgent call for attention.
New Emergency UK Data Retention Law- What’s actually happening? Read More »
It’s difficult to know how to react constructively to the story of the bodies of children in Tuam.
The EU Commission published its assessment and recommendations for Ireland yesterday.
The Taoiseach has published the Draft National Risk Assessment for 2014.
The Court of Justice of the European Union is the highest court in the EU.
CJEU Judgement: Google -v- AEPD and the rise of EU privacy law Read More »
The HSE has circulated a letter to GPs around the country informing them of the State’s scheme to pay for women who require surgery to remove PIP implants to have them removed.
Gavin Sheridan has an excellent essay in today’s Sunday Independent, debunking all the arguments advanced for our State’s insistence on charging an upfront fee for making a Freedom of Information request.
When Eoin O’Dell was free to publish his blog “cearta”, one of his perennial topics was that of legal education.
The ECJ judgement on Digital Rights Ireland\’s challenge to the EU\’s data retention regime.
Digital Rights Ireland: ECJ Judgment striking down Data Retention Read More »
In Damache v DPP, Ireland & the Attorney General, IESC [2101], (“Damache”) the Supreme court decided that Section 29(1) of the Offences against the State Act, 1939 (as inserted by s.
